Hypothesis spaces for minimum Bayes risk training in large vocabulary speech recognition

The Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) framework has been a successful strategy for the training of hidden Markov models for large vocabulary speech recognition. Practical implementations of MBR must select an appropriate hypothesis space and loss function. The set of word sequences and a word-based Levenshtein distance may be assumed to be the optimal choice but use of phoneme-based criteria appears to be more successful. This paper compares the use of different hypothesis spaces and loss functions defined using the system constituents of word, phone, physical triphone, physical state and physical mixture component. For practical reasons the competing hypotheses are constrained by sampling. The impact of the sampling technique on the performance of MBR training is also examined.